This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taoism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaoismWikipedia:WikiProject TaoismTemplate:WikiProject TaoismTaoism
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Alan Watts is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
WP:ETHNICITY is really quite clear. Unless he is notable for things he did as a British citizen before becoming an American, we don't use the first sentence of the lead to identify his country of birth. It doesn't matter if he has dual citizenship. He is notable for his lectures and books written while in the US. In the case of, say Arnold Schwarzenegger we say he was "Austrian and American" because he was a notable Austrian actor before moving to the US. But we don't say Austrian-American, and we don't say "Austrian born". Thems the rules. I didn't make them.DolyaIskrina (talk) 20:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, happy to discuss. Let's find a way to come to some consensus on this. But first: in your last edit you restored the word "English" in the short description. That was not your intention, was it? Moving on, yes I'd say he certainly was notable for things he did as a British citizen before becoming an American citizen. His British education and his subsequent activities as a British citizen — such as his participation in the World Congress of Faiths in London, and his early publications — are an important part of his notability. If you want to word this as "British and American" I'd certainly agree with that, and I do believe this belongs in the first sentence of the lead. Jōkepedia (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am okay with "British and American" in a subsequent sentence. I'm pretty sure that, as long as it's not in the first sentence, it's even okay to say "British-born". DolyaIskrina (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Now, as you pointed out, Schwarzenegger is "Austrian and American" enough to have that in the first sentence of his article. I'd say Watts, and his British accent on the radio, were certainly "British and American" enough as well. Wouldn't it be best to follow that example? Someone's likely to wordsmith it back into the first sentence eventually without reading this discussion anyway. Jōkepedia (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter if he has dual citizenship. I think it does, and I'm not sure your certainty that it does not is warranted. "British-American", to me, is a nationality, not an 'ethnicity'. Marcus Markup (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"The opening paragraph should usually provide context for that which made the person notable. In most modern-day cases, this will be the country, region, or territory where the person is currently a national or permanent resident" DolyaIskrina (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a long and rambling article, with lots of uncited or poorly cited opinions, and some enormous quotes. Would there be any interest in rewriting it to look more like a Wikipedia article and less like an essay? John (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]